comparison of conventional ivf versus icsi in non-male factor, normoresponder patients
نویسندگان
چکیده
background: conventional ivf and icsi are two common techniques to achieve fertilization. ivf has long been used for treatment of infertility, although it is not an effective treatment in severe male infertility. the use of icsi has been expanded in severe male factor and fertilization failure after ivf cycle. in spite of the widespread use of icsi in patients with non-male factor infertility, there is still little evidence to confirm its effectiveness in this population. objective: to evaluate assisted reproductive technology outcomes between ivf and icsi cycles in non-male factor, normoresponder patients. materials and methods: a total of 220 non-male factors, normoresponder patients who were indicated for art were enrolled in this study. the patients received standard long gnrh agonist or gnrh antagonist protocols for ovarian stimulation and after oocytes retrieval, the patients were divided into two groups (ivf and icsi groups). in ivf group (n=112), all of retrieved oocytes were treated by conventional ivf and in icsi group (n=88), microinjection (icsi) was done on all of retrieved oocytes. results: in ivf group, fertilization and implantation rates were significantly higher than icsi group (66.22% and 16.67% in ivf group versus 57.46% and 11.17% in icsi group, respectively). chemical and clinical pregnancy rates were statistically higher in ivf group as compared with the icsi group (42.9% vs. 27.3% and 35.7% vs. 21.5%, respectively). conclusion: according to our study, the routine use of icsi is not improved fertilization, implantation and chemical pregnancy rates and is not recommended in non-male factor, normozoospermic patients.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of conventional IVF versus ICSI in non-male factor, normoresponder patients
BACKGROUND Conventional IVF and ICSI are two common techniques to achieve fertilization. IVF has long been used for treatment of infertility, although it is not an effective treatment in severe male infertility. The use of ICSI has been expanded in severe male factor and fertilization failure after IVF cycle. In spite of the widespread use of ICSI in patients with non-male factor infertility, t...
متن کاملO-22: Comparison of Conventional IVF versus ICSI in Non-Male Factor, Norm Responder Patients
Background: Conventional IVF and ICSI are two common techniques to achieve fertilization. IVF has long been used for treatment of infertility, although it is not an effective treatment in severe male infertility. The use of ICSI has been expanded in severe male factor and fertilization failure after IVF cycle. In spite of the widespread use of ICSI in patients with non-male factor infertility, ...
متن کاملEffectiveness of HP-hMG versus r-FSH in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles with moderate male-factor infertility
* Correspondence: [email protected]
متن کاملVaginal micronized progesterone capsule versus vaginal progesterone gel for lutheal support in normoresponder IVF/ICSI-ET cycles
OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of luteal phase support by micronized progesteron vaginal capsule 600mg/day and progesterone vaginal gel 180mg/day in the normoresponder IVF/ICSI-ET cycles of the patients down-regulated via GnRH agonist long protocol or fixed antagonist protocol below 40 years of age. METHODS A total of 463 normoresponder cycles between January 2013 and December 2013 were re...
متن کاملComparison of IVF/ICSI outcome in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome or tubal factor infertility.
BACKGROUND One of the recognized treatment options for patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Fears are however sometimes raised concerning the likely outcome of treatment in such patients compared with their counterparts with tubal factor infertility. OBJECTIVE To compare the IVF/ICSI performance in women w...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
international journal of reproductive biomedicineجلد ۱۰، شماره ۲، صفحات ۱۳۱-۰
کلمات کلیدی
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023